Prediction of Tristan Mccormick [680th] vs Reese Stalder [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W W L
Form
L L L L L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Mccormick 1 - 0 Stalder
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mccormick winning 2 and Stalder winning 1. The last match between Mccormick and Stalder was at the Merida Challenger, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Tristan Mccormick getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tristan Mccormick | 1 |
| Reese Stalder | 0 |
| Mccormick | Stats | Stalder |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (11-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 680 | Ranking | N/A |
| 495 | Highest Rank | |
| 26 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (114-87) | Career Total W/L | 55% (73-60) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Reese Stalder
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:4:14 | Average Match Time | 2:4:14 |
| 59% (47/79) | 1st Serve % | 53% (49/92) |
| 72% (34/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (30/49) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (19/43) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 47% (43/92) | Return Points Win % | 38% (30/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tristan Mccormick vs Reese Stalder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mccormick 1 - 0 Stalder
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mccormick has won 45.81% of points on their second serve, while Stalder has won 44.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mccormick, in recent form, has won 46.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stalder has won 50.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.55% and 32.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mccormick has saved 56.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stalder has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mccormick has won 48.53% of matches played (W/L 33/ 35), with Stalder winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mccormick has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 47/ 36). Stalder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 70/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mccormick has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/ 27), where as Stalder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mccormick winning 1 times and Stalder being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mccormick winning 2 and Stalder winning 1. The last match between Mccormick and Stalder was at the Merida Challenger, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Tristan Mccormick getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mccormick and Stalder have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mccormick winning 1 times and Stalder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mccormick winning 0, and Stalder 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mccormick has played against opponents with an average rank of 86.5 while Stalder has played against players with an average rank of 194.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mccormick has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stalder has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mccormick has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stalder has converted 41.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Tristan Mccormick vs Reese Stalder Best Odds For The Match
Tristan Mccormick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Juan Sebastian Osorio
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
10
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Elijah Strode
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
39%
(
20 of
51)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Tristan Mccormick
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Esdras Martinez
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
12
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Tristan Mccormick
50%
(
50 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
10
Aces
8
15
Double Faults
9
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Tristan Mccormick
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
19 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Reese Stalder
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kase Schinnerer
Player
Tristan Mccormick
49%
(
50 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
9
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Lucca Pinto
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Reese Stalder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Reese Stalder
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Reese Stalder
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
51 of
106)
2
Aces
18
8
Double Faults
10
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reese Stalder
Player
Ji Sung Nam
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Reese Stalder
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mccormick vs Stalder?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mccormick Vs Stalder is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (114/87) | Win/Loss | 55% (73/60) |
| 55% (256/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (159/136) |
| 52% (2390/2201) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1455/1350) |
| 0.55 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1234 | Aces Total | 284 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 753 | Total Double Faults | 141 |
| 1:37:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 138.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 169.74 |
| 59% (6999/11951) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2311/3890) |
| 75% (5224/6999) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1579/2311) |
| 50% (2491/4953) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (794/1579) |
| 38% (418/1086) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (131/288) |
| 37% (4534/12258) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1339/3671) |
| 57% (113/198) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (72/130) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (44/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (17/37) |
| 58% (38/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 87% (106/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (68/63) |
| 13% (106/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (68/5) |
| 23% (95/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (65/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
